1901 St. Louis Cardinals

Franchise seasons · 1900s seasons

Independent, unofficial historical lineup simulator. Games here are simulated exhibitions, not historical results.

Roster and season statistics

Only players appear here. Staff are excluded from lineup choices. — means the source has no usable value. A roster player may have no batting or pitching row if they did not appear in those tables.

PlayerPosition groupNo.Stat rowsABHHRAVGIPERARating
Ted BreitensteinPitchers—pitching————15.006.60
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Farmer BurnsPitchers—No stat row——————
No ratingThe source has no pitching stat row for this player. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Chauncey FisherPitchers—pitching—————15.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Jack HarperPitchers—pitching————308.673.62
Average (51) — 34 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.62 over 308.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Cowboy JonesPitchers—pitching————76.334.48
Average (47) — 52 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.48 over 76.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Bill MageePitchers—pitching————8.004.50
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Ed MurphyPitchers—pitching————165.004.20
Average (47) — 52 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.20 over 165.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Mike O'NeillPitchers—pitching————41.001.32
Average (58) — 9 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 1.32 over 41.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack PowellPitchers—pitching————338.333.54
Average (52) — 26 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.54 over 338.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Willie SudhoffPitchers—pitching————276.333.52
Average (52) — 26 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.52 over 276.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Bob WickerPitchers—pitching—————0.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Stan YerkesPitchers—pitching————34.003.18
Average (52) — 26 of 72 pitchers in the available 1901 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.18 over 34.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Mike HeydonCatchers—batting4391.209——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Art NicholsCatchers—batting308751.244——
Average (47) — 105 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 308 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack RyanCatchers—batting300590.197——
Below average (40) — 140 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 300 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Pop SchriverCatchers—batting166451.271——
Average (51) — 67 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 166 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Pete ChildsInfielders—batting79210.266——
Average (49) — 86 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 79 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Otto KruegerInfielders—batting5201432.275——
Average (51) — 67 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 520 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Dan McGannInfielders—batting4231156.272——
Average (53) — 47 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 423 at-bats and 6 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Dick PaddenInfielders—batting4891252.256——
Average (48) — 98 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 489 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Bill RichardsonInfielders—batting52112.212——
Average (50) — 77 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 52 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Bobby WallaceInfielders—batting5501782.324——
Average (58) — 16 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 550 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jesse BurkettOutfielders—batting60122610.376——
Strong (69) — 2 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 601 at-bats and 10 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Patsy DonovanOutfielders—batting5311611.303——
Average (54) — 39 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 531 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Emmet HeidrickOutfielders—batting5021706.339——
Strong (62) — 7 of 146 batters in the available 1901 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 502 at-bats and 6 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.

Build a lineup

Exhibition rules use nine hitters, including a DH, and one pitcher. The numbered slots are the batting order. Pick each player once. Opponent: 1901 Baltimore Orioles. Players without a rating remain selectable with estimated performance.

Keep the seed to replay the same game; change it to play a different exhibition.

Simulated exhibition

Choose a lineup to play an exhibition.

Batting lines

Game log for the selected game

    Roster and statistics adapted from Wikipedia contributors, 1901 St. Louis Cardinals season. Retrieved 2026-09-30T17:13:29.074861+00:00. Source material is under CC BY-SA 4.0. We grouped roster entries, excluded staff, joined stats by Wikipedia page title, converted baseball innings notation to outs, and derived approximate ratings and simulated outcomes. No official affiliation.