1905 St. Louis Cardinals

Franchise seasons · 1900s seasons

Independent, unofficial historical lineup simulator. Games here are simulated exhibitions, not historical results.

Roster and season statistics

Only players appear here. Staff are excluded from lineup choices. — means the source has no usable value. A roster player may have no batting or pitching row if they did not appear in those tables.

PlayerPosition groupNo.Stat rowsABHHRAVGIPERARating
Buster BrownPitchers—pitching————178.672.97
Average (49) — 57 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.97 over 178.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Billy CampbellPitchers—pitching————17.007.41
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Wish EganPitchers—pitching————171.333.97
Below average (40) — 89 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.97 over 171.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Win KellumPitchers—pitching————74.002.92
Average (50) — 50 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.92 over 74.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Sandy McDougalPitchers—pitching————44.673.43
Average (47) — 62 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.43 over 44.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Chappie McFarlandPitchers—pitching————250.333.81
Below average (40) — 89 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.81 over 250.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jim McGinleyPitchers—pitching————3.0015.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Kid NicholsPitchers—pitching————51.675.40
Below average (36) — 94 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 5.40 over 51.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack TaylorPitchers—pitching————309.003.44
Below average (44) — 78 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.44 over 309.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jake ThielmanPitchers—pitching————242.003.50
Below average (43) — 86 of 94 pitchers in the available 1905 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.50 over 242.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Mike GradyCatchers—batting311894.286——
Average (59) — 20 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 311 at-bats and 4 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Tom LeahyCatchers—batting97220.227——
Average (47) — 128 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 97 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Gerry SheaCatchers—batting620.333——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Jack WarnerCatchers—batting137351.255——
Average (52) — 67 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 137 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Dave ZearfossCatchers—batting5180.157——
Below average (44) — 153 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 51 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Harry ArndtInfielders—batting4151012.243——
Average (50) — 85 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 415 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jake BeckleyInfielders—batting5141471.286——
Average (56) — 33 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 514 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Dave BrainInfielders—batting158361.228——
Average (48) — 110 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 158 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jimmy BurkeInfielders—batting431971.225——
Average (46) — 135 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 431 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
John FarrellInfielders—batting2440.167——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Art HoelskoetterInfielders—both83200.2416.001.50
Average (49) — 101 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 83 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
George McBrideInfielders—batting281612.217——
Average (47) — 128 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 281 at-bats and 2 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Simmy MurchInfielders—batting910.111——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Danny ShayInfielders—batting281670.238——
Average (48) — 110 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 281 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Josh ClarkeOutfielders—batting167433.257——
Average (55) — 37 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 167 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Rube DeGroffOutfielders—batting56140.250——
Average (50) — 85 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 56 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack DunleavyOutfielders—batting4351051.241——
Average (49) — 101 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 435 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack HimesOutfielders—batting4160.146——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Spike ShannonOutfielders—batting5441460.268——
Average (52) — 67 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 544 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Homer SmootOutfielders—batting5341664.311——
Strong (63) — 5 of 181 batters in the available 1905 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 534 at-bats and 4 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.

Build a lineup

Exhibition rules use nine hitters, including a DH, and one pitcher. The numbered slots are the batting order. Pick each player once. Opponent: 1905 Boston Americans. Players without a rating remain selectable with estimated performance.

Keep the seed to replay the same game; change it to play a different exhibition.

Simulated exhibition

Choose a lineup to play an exhibition.

Batting lines

Game log for the selected game

    Roster and statistics adapted from Wikipedia contributors, 1905 St. Louis Cardinals season. Retrieved 2026-09-30T17:03:37.596504+00:00. Source material is under CC BY-SA 4.0. We grouped roster entries, excluded staff, joined stats by Wikipedia page title, converted baseball innings notation to outs, and derived approximate ratings and simulated outcomes. No official affiliation.