1909 Chicago White Sox

Franchise seasons · 1900s seasons

Independent, unofficial historical lineup simulator. Games here are simulated exhibitions, not historical results.

Roster and season statistics

Only players appear here. Staff are excluded from lineup choices. — means the source has no usable value. A roster player may have no batting or pitching row if they did not appear in those tables.

PlayerPosition groupNo.Stat rowsABHHRAVGIPERARating
Nick AltrockPitchers—pitching————9.005.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Bill BurnsPitchers—pitching————168.002.04
Average (55) — 20 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.04 over 168.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Lou FienePitchers—pitching————72.004.13
Below average (43) — 112 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.13 over 72.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Fred OlmsteadPitchers—pitching————54.671.81
Average (54) — 27 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 1.81 over 54.67 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Frank OwenPitchers—pitching————16.004.50
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Jim ScottPitchers—pitching————250.332.30
Average (53) — 37 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.30 over 250.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Frank SmithPitchers—pitching————365.001.80
Average (58) — 8 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 1.80 over 365.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Harry SuterPitchers—pitching————87.332.47
Average (51) — 63 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.47 over 87.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Ed WalshPitchers—pitching————230.331.41
Strong (60) — 4 of 122 pitchers in the available 1909 rostersAn earned-run average of 1.41 over 230.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Yip OwensCatchers—batting174350.201——
Below average (44) — 168 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 174 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Fred PayneCatchers—batting82200.244——
Average (49) — 108 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 82 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Billy SullivanCatchers—batting265430.162——
Below average (37) — 197 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 265 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jake AtzInfielders—batting381900.236——
Average (47) — 134 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 381 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
George DavisInfielders—batting6890.132——
Below average (41) — 189 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 68 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jiggs DonahueInfielders—batting400.000——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Frank IsbellInfielders—batting433970.224——
Average (45) — 159 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 433 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Freddy ParentInfielders—batting4721230.261——
Average (51) — 84 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 472 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Ham PattersonInfielders—batting300.000——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Billy PurtellInfielders—batting361930.258——
Average (51) — 84 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 361 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Barney ReillyInfielders—batting2550.200——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Lee TannehillInfielders—batting5311180.222——
Below average (44) — 168 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 531 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Dave AltizerOutfielders—batting382891.233——
Average (48) — 122 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 382 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Cuke BarrowsOutfielders—batting2030.150——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Willis ColeOutfielders—batting165390.236——
Average (48) — 122 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 165 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Gavvy CravathOutfielders—batting5091.180——
Average (49) — 108 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 50 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Patsy DoughertyOutfielders—batting4911401.285——
Average (56) — 29 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 491 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Ed HahnOutfielders—batting287521.181——
Below average (40) — 192 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 287 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Bobby MessengerOutfielders—batting112190.170——
Below average (42) — 185 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 112 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Mike WeldayOutfielders—batting74140.189——
Average (45) — 159 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 74 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Doc WhiteOutfielders—both192450.234177.671.72
Average (47) — 134 of 197 batters in the available 1909 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 192 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.

Build a lineup

Exhibition rules use nine hitters, including a DH, and one pitcher. The numbered slots are the batting order. Pick each player once. Opponent: 1909 Boston Red Sox. Players without a rating remain selectable with estimated performance.

Keep the seed to replay the same game; change it to play a different exhibition.

Simulated exhibition

Choose a lineup to play an exhibition.

Batting lines

Game log for the selected game

    Roster and statistics adapted from Wikipedia contributors, 1909 Chicago White Sox season. Retrieved 2026-09-30T16:51:01.880562+00:00. Source material is under CC BY-SA 4.0. We grouped roster entries, excluded staff, joined stats by Wikipedia page title, converted baseball innings notation to outs, and derived approximate ratings and simulated outcomes. No official affiliation.