1902 Chicago White Stockings

Franchise seasons · 1900s seasons

Independent, unofficial historical lineup simulator. Games here are simulated exhibitions, not historical results.

Roster and season statistics

Only players appear here. Staff are excluded from lineup choices. — means the source has no usable value. A roster player may have no batting or pitching row if they did not appear in those tables.

PlayerPosition groupNo.Stat rowsABHHRAVGIPERARating
Nixey CallahanPitchers—pitching————282.333.60
Average (50) — 40 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.60 over 282.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
James DurhamPitchers—pitching————20.005.85
Average (46) — 57 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 5.85 over 20.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Ned GarvinPitchers—pitching————175.332.21
Average (59) — 9 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 2.21 over 175.33 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Clark GriffithPitchers—pitching————213.004.18
Average (46) — 57 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 4.18 over 213.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Jack KatollPitchers—pitching—————0.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Dummy LeitnerPitchers—pitching—————13.50
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Sam McMackinPitchers—pitching—————0.00
Not enough dataThe available innings and earned-run average do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this pitcher; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Roy PattersonPitchers—pitching————268.003.06
Average (54) — 22 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.06 over 268.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Wiley PiattPitchers—pitching————246.003.51
Average (51) — 36 of 74 pitchers in the available 1902 rostersAn earned-run average of 3.51 over 246.00 innings informs this pitching score. Lower earned-run averages indicate better run prevention. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Ed HughesCatchers—batting410.250——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Ed McFarlandCatchers—No stat row——————
No ratingThe source has no batting stat row for this player. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Billy SullivanCatchers—batting263641.243——
Average (47) — 92 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 263 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Tom DalyInfielders—batting4891101.225——
Below average (43) — 122 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 489 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
George DavisInfielders—batting4851453.299——
Average (56) — 26 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 485 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Frank IsbellInfielders—both5151304.252—2.25
Average (49) — 76 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 515 at-bats and 4 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Sammy StrangInfielders—batting5361583.295——
Average (55) — 33 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 536 at-bats and 3 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Danny GreenOutfielders—batting4811500.312——
Average (56) — 26 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 481 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Fielder JonesOutfielders—batting5321710.321——
Average (57) — 22 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 532 at-bats and 0 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.
Herm McFarlandOutfielders—batting2750.185——
Not enough dataThe available at-bats and hits do not support a reliable comparison. You can still select this batter; the exhibition uses estimated performance.
Sam MertesOutfielders—both4971401.2824.671.93
Average (52) — 57 of 133 batters in the available 1902 rostersBatting average and home runs per at-bat inform this hitting score, using 497 at-bats and 1 home runs from the source. Shorter playing records receive more cautious scores. This rank compares simulation ratings, with equal scores sharing a rank; it is not a ranking of every player in the league.

Build a lineup

Exhibition rules use nine hitters, including a DH, and one pitcher. The numbered slots are the batting order. Pick each player once. Opponent: 1902 Boston Americans. Players without a rating remain selectable with estimated performance.

Keep the seed to replay the same game; change it to play a different exhibition.

Simulated exhibition

Choose a lineup to play an exhibition.

Batting lines

Game log for the selected game

    Roster and statistics adapted from Wikipedia contributors, 1902 Chicago White Stockings season. Retrieved 2026-09-30T17:09:43.368292+00:00. Source material is under CC BY-SA 4.0. We grouped roster entries, excluded staff, joined stats by Wikipedia page title, converted baseball innings notation to outs, and derived approximate ratings and simulated outcomes. No official affiliation.